specialize with context

no

forever sampling can become a very educated way to avoid choosing

the book’s useful thesis is more nuanced: sample broadly enough to understand yourself and the domain, then commit better

because in wicked domains, early certainty is often borrowed confidence

you may not know what fits until you have touched a few real problems

exactly

Tiger-style early depth works in kind games

Federer-style sampling helps when match quality and transfer matter

each detour should collect information or build transferable skill

otherwise it is just wandering with nicer vocabulary

same wound over here

learning from varied practice

using analogies carefully

updating forecasts

dropping familiar tools

working with people trained differently

yes

Range is a book about frame mobility

move between lenses without pretending all lenses are equal

build a portfolio of experiments, then prune it

keep what teaches, compounds, or fits. cut what only flatters your identity

it should a little

when the work fits better than alternatives, feedback is improving you, and the next level requires depth you actually want to earn

yes

sample broadly, then stop sampling as soon as the evidence is good enough to build

perfect

specialization with windows open

trying not to make it a poster

please use terrible font. bye