Saturday, June 20, 2026 · 9:41 AM
ok dumb question, what’s the deal with you solved the wrong problem?
Problem framing and problem setting decide what you notice, what you ignore, and what kind of solution even seems possible. If you accept the brief's frame too quickly, you can end up solving the wrong…
so the villain is... my brain trying to be helpful?
pretty much
your brain hates blank space, so it fills it with the nearest sample: you
In 1983, Donald Schön wrote something that should have changed how design education works but mostly didn’t.
that feels rude but accurate
think of it like designing a hotel room while standing in your own bedroom. everything feels obvious because you know where your socks are
wait so the fix is just ‘ask users’?
annoyingly, no
asking helps, but the chapter is warning you about the gap between what feels true and what survives contact
Many design problems work like this. You design the onboarding flow to reduce drop-off. Reducing drop-off means more users reach the core product, which strains…
ok that’s the part people skip
yep. the frame shapes the answer is the trap door
then it shows up as some problems change as you work on them
Horst Rittel and Melvin Webber named a category of problem in 1973 that most designers are dealing with every day without a word for it.
so what do i actually do differently on monday
make the hidden assumption visible before the review starts
then test the behavior, not just whether the room nods
and if a choice only works for informed, patient, caffeinated people, treat that as a bug
that’s the series tbh
design psychology is mostly noticing the human nonsense before it ships
ok send me the next one after i recover
Read Sat, Jun 20 · 10:03 AM